• The Navy is preparing the MITT Supplemental EIS/OEIS to:
  • Update the Mariana Islands Training and Testing Final EIS/OEIS (referred to as the “2015 Final EIS/OEIS”), which was completed with community input in July 2015.
  • Support ongoing and future activities conducted at sea and on FDM within the Study Area beyond 2020.
  • Incorporate new information from an updated acoustic effects model, updated marine mammal density data, and evolving and emergent best available science.
  • Support the issuance of federal regulatory permits and authorizations under the Marine Mammal Protection Act and the Endangered Species Act.
  • Update at-sea training and testing activities based on evolving requirements.
  • Assess the potential environmental impacts associated with ongoing training and testing activities conducted within the MITT EIS/OEIS Study Area (hereafter referred to as the “Study Area”). 

Proposed at-sea training and testing activities within the Study Area are generally consistent with those analyzed in the 2015 Final EIS/OEIS and are similar to activities that have been occurring in the Study Area for decades.

Because the Proposed Action is to continue ongoing military readiness activities, a supplement to the 2015 Final EIS/OEIS was deemed the most appropriate for complying with the National Environmental Policy Act.

The Navy needs to re-analyze at-sea training and testing activities in the Study Area beyond 2020 and document the findings to obtain authorizations and permits as required under the Marine Mammal Protection Act and the Endangered Species Act.

• In the Supplemental EIS/OEIS, the Navy will:
  • Include a No Action Alternative in which proposed at-sea training and testing activities would not be conducted and Marine Mammal Protection Act authorization would not be issued by NMFS.
  • Include analyses of increases in testing of some new vessels and weapons systems, and decreases in other testing activities.
  • Include analyses of increases in the annual occurrence of, and ordnance (if any) used in certain activities.
  • Recategorize or rename some testing activities to be consistent with Navy testing activity categories.
  • Include improved acoustic models, updated marine mammal and sea turtle densities, and updated marine species criteria and thresholds based on NMFS’s 2016 guidance.
  • Use the most current and best available science and analytical methods.
  • Revise procedural mitigations where appropriate, and consider geographic mitigation where applicable.

The Proposed Action is needed to meet military readiness requirements. At-sea training and testing must be diverse and as realistic as possible to fully prepare military personnel for what they will experience in real-world situations and ensure their success and survival.

• The Study Area is strategically significant for accomplishing the military mission. For decades, the Mariana Islands have provided an ideal location in the Indo-Asia-Pacific region for the military to maintain a global and strategic presence.
• The Study Area plays a vital role in the execution of the naval readiness mandate. It has unique attributes, including location, proximity to concentrations of U.S. forces, environment, and size, which make it an ideal venue for training military personnel and testing equipment and systems. 

• When possible, military personnel use simulators and other advanced technologies when training and testing, and recent advancements and improvements in simulator technology has led to an increase in usage. Simulation, however, can only work at the basic operator level and cannot completely replace training and testing in a live environment.
• Despite advancements and improvements to simulator technology, there are still limits to the realism technology can provide.
  • Simulation cannot provide the real-world accuracy and level of training needed to prepare naval forces for deployment
  • Simulation cannot replicate a high-stress environment nor the complexity in coordinating with other military personnel
  • Simulation cannot replicate dynamic environments involving numerous military forces and cannot accurately model sound in complex training environments

• Yes. The Navy proposes to conduct at-sea training and testing activities, which include the use of active sonar within the Study Area, while employing marine species protective mitigation measures. The Navy will reanalyze the potential environmental effects of sonar use in the Supplemental EIS/OEIS.

• Training and testing at sea with explosives significantly enhances the safety of U.S. forces in combat and improves readiness and equipment reliability.
• Training in a high-stress environment, including the use of and exposure to explosive ordnance, is necessary for military personnel to be fully prepared to respond to emergencies and national security threats, and to ensure their own safety.
• Training and testing at sea with in-water explosives is limited, occurs only in established operating areas, and only after the Navy issues notices to mariners and pilots to ensure public safety. 

• The Navy will reanalyze the potential direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts on the following environmental resource areas:
  • Physical Resources:
    • Air quality
    • Sediments and water quality
  • Biological Resources:
    • Vegetation
    • Invertebrates
    • Habitats
    • Fishes
    • Marine mammals
    • Reptiles
    • Birds
  • Human Resources:
    • Cultural
    • Socioeconomic
    • Public health and safety

Avoiding impacts from at-sea training and testing on the marine environment is an important goal for the military. In its commitment to environmental protection, and in compliance with existing laws, permits, and authorizations, the military follows strict guidelines and employs protective measures to reduce effects on marine species while at-sea training and testing. 

• Military personnel share the ocean and coastal areas with the community and recognize the importance of public access. The military strives to be a good neighbor by minimizing access restrictions and limiting the extent and duration of closures of public areas whenever possible while ensuring safety at all times.
• Some temporary restrictions must occur when appropriate to ensure public safety. When certain at-sea training and testing activities are scheduled, notices to mariners are published for public awareness and safety, helping the public plan accordingly to avoid temporarily restricted areas. The Coast Guard publishes and broadcasts notices to mariners with location, activity, and during information. Mariners are requested to read and adhere to the published notices.

• It is not the military’s intent to further restrict public access because of proposed activities; however, the safety of military personnel and the public is of utmost importance. For the public’s safety, public access to some sea areas during certain training and testing activities may be temporarily limited. With the exception of exclusive use or restricted areas, the public has access during periods when not in use by the military.
• The Navy determines the hazard for each activity and notifies the public at least 72 hours in advance of a requirement for a temporary closure of waters or airspace to ensure public safety. The Supplemental EIS/OEIS will analyze proposed activity increases and corresponding potential increase in temporary closures for public safety.
• When areas are scheduled for military use, the Navy coordinates with the Coast Guard and Federal Aviation Administration to publish notices of temporary closures to help the public plan accordingly and avoid temporarily restricted areas. Appropriate local agencies are notified.

• Because dangerous military activities are conducted on FDM (an active military training area), restrictions have been established. Restricted areas are intended to keep airmen, fishermen, and other people safe. However, when FDM is not in use by the military, civilian vessels have access up to the 3-nautical mile radius around the island.
• The safety of the public and military personnel is of utmost importance. The military observes every precaution when planning and conducting training and testing activities. Some precautionary measures include:
  • Ensuring impact areas and targets are unpopulated prior to potentially dangerous activities.
  • Canceling or delaying activities if public or personnel safety is a concern.
  • Notifying the public of the location, date, and time of potentially dangerous activities.
  • Implementing temporary access restrictions to training and testing areas.
  • Conducting thorough environmental and safety reviews for all test systems before tests are conducted on range sites.
• The Coast Guard publishes and broadcasts notices to mariners with location, activity, and duration information. Mariners are requested to read and adhere to the published notices.

• The Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Energy, Installations, and Environment) is the decision-maker regarding the selection and implementation of an alternative. The decision is based on many factors, including the details of the environmental analyses, breadth of public comment, recommendations from military commands, and mission requirements.

• The Navy requests and actively solicits feedback and comments from the public, government agencies, elected officials, and nongovernmental organizations. Substantive public comments will be considered and incorporated into the Supplemental EIS/OEIS, as applicable.

• Yes, during the scoping phase the public provided input that will be considered in the development of the Draft Supplemental EIS/OEIS.
• The Draft Supplemental EIS/OEIS is anticipated to be released in the fall of 2018 for public review. Public meetings will be held after the release of the Draft Supplemental EIS/OEIS, and public comments will be accepted.

• Conducting a thorough analysis generally takes about a year and a half following the scoping phase. The Draft Supplemental EIS/OEIS is expected in fall 2018. The Navy’s focus is to ensure accurate and complete information and data, including your comments, are collected and appropriately analyzed.
• When documents are available, a notice will be published in the Federal Register and in local newspapers, and the document will be available to view and download on this website.

• A Record of Decision is expected in summer 2020. Please know that the date may change.